Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sconzo v. Flower 248 A.D.2d 458

← Cases

Sconzo v. Flower

248 A.D.2d 458 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1998-03-09 English

Judges Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 458
Thomas Sconzo et al., Respondents, v Edward Flower et al., Appellants.

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated January 13, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[668 NYS2d 934]

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Material issues of fact exist which require the denial of the

defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.