Majority
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered July 5, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241 , 244, cert denied 396 US 846 ; People v Heung K. Sul, 234 AD2d 563 ; People v Schinas, 204 AD2d 362 ; see also, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).
O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 644
- People v. Schwartzman 24 NY2d 241 at 244 p. 644
- People v. Schinas 204 AD2d 362 p. 644
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 644