Majority
—Appeal from judg
Reading defendant’s omnibus motion as a whole (People v Face, 247 AD2d 336 ), we conclude that defense counsel sufficiently, if inartfully, identified the source of the factual allegations regarding defendant’s actions prior to and at the time of his arrest (see, People v Lewis, 247 AD2d 227 ). Furthermore, we find that since defendant denied his participation in the drug transaction and the People’s response added nothing other than to suggest that defendant was arrested because he sold drugs, defendant is entitled to a Mapp hearing (see, People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988 , 990; People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 ; People v Marquez, 246 AD2d 330 ). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Hightower 85 NY2d 988 at 990 p. 213
- People v. Mendoza 82 NY2d 415 p. 213