Hyperlawhypertext legal database ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc. 249 A.D.2d 983

← Cases

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.

249 A.D.2d 983 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1998-04-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 983
ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH, Respondent, v Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[671 NYS2d 383]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant

p. 984
ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604 , 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520 , 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105 , 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169 , 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.