Majority
—Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered April 7, 1997, which, in an action by plaintiff assignee to recover on a promissory note made by defendant and endorsed over to a bank that
Had the Resolution Trust Corp. sued on the note itself instead of assigning it to plaintiff, the six-year Statute of Limitations of 12 USC § 1821 (d) (14) (A) (i) would have applied. New York law, which is applicable (see, Federal Fin. Co. v Hall, 108 F3d 46 , 50 [4th Cir], cert denied 522 US 858 ), provides that the “[t]ransfer of an instrument vests in the transferee such rights as the transferor has therein” (UCC 3-201 [1]).
Accordingly, the right to benefit from the Federal limitations period was among the rights that were transferred to plaintiff upon assignment of the note by Resolution Trust (cf, Federal Fin. Co. v Gerard, 89 Wash App 445 , 949 P2d 412 ; National Enters, v Moore, 948 F Supp 567 [ED Va]). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ. [See, 172 Mise 2d 857.]