Majority
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered February 7, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 , 761). The court’s instruction on the “place of business” exception of Penal Law § 265.02 (4) was correct. Defendant was not in his “place of business” when he stood on the street corner near his cab, ostensibly waiting to escort a customer to the cab (People v Figueroa, 207 AD2d 670 ; see also, People v Powell, 54 NY2d 524 , 531; People v Buckmire, 237 AD2d 151 , 152, lv denied 90 NY2d 902 ).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion and find that the sentence was not based on any inappropriate criteria. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Powell 54 NY2d 524 at 531 p. 693
- People v. Buckmire 237 AD2d 151 at 152 p. 693