Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered February 1, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and crim
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495). We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations as to credibility and reliability of identification testimony.
The court properly exercised its discretion in conducting a Sandoval hearing upon retrial. The prior court’s Sandoval ruling, involving admissibility of evidence “based upon an evidentiary principle”, was not binding on the retrial (People v Nieves, 67 NY2d 125 , 136).
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, and find them to be unpersuasive. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 709
- People v. Nieves 67 NY2d 125 at 136 p. 709