Majority
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated January 22, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the petition is granted.
Parties will not be held to have chosen arbitration as the forum for the resolution of their disputes in the absence of an express, unequivocal agreement to that effect. Absent such an explicit commitment, neither party may be compelled to arbitrate (see, Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181 ; Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509 , 512). In addition, parties can, by agreement, exclude certain issues from arbitration by stating such exclusion in the plain language of their contract (see, Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1 ; Matter of Riccardi [Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.], 36 NY2d 945 ). Upon our review of the agree
Cases cited
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & Goddess 61 NY2d 181 p. 425
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'n 42 NY2d 509 at 512 p. 425
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co. 51 NY2d 1 p. 425
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co. 36 NY2d 945 p. 425