Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [4]) and criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b]) and sentencing him as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of incarceration of IV2 to 3 years. The sole contention of defendant on appeal is that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statements on the ground that they were not preceded by Miranda warnings.
The court properly refused to suppress defendant’s initial oral statements at the police station. Although those statements were not preceded by Miranda warnings, they were spontaneous and not in response to “interrogation”, i.e., words or actions by police that were intended or likely to elicit an incriminating response (see, Rhode Island v Innis, 446 US 291 , 300-302; People v Velasquez, 68 NY2d 533 , 537; People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316 , 318, 322-323, cert denied 472 US 1007 ; People v Maerling, 46 NY2d 289 , 303).
Cases cited
- Rhode Island v. Innis 446 US 291 at 300-302 p. 794
- People v. Velasquez 68 NY2d 533 at 537 p. 794
- People v. Ferro 63 NY2d 316 at 318, 322-323 p. 794
- People v. Maerling 46 NY2d 289 at 303 p. 794
- People v. Gagliardi 232 AD2d 879 at 880 p. 795
- People v. Morales 228 AD2d 525 p. 795
- People v. Shabaz 173 AD2d 498 at 499 p. 795
- People v. Schompert 19 NY2d 300 at 305-307 p. 795