Hyperlawhypertext legal database Gerard v. City of New York 255 A.D.2d 102

← Cases

Gerard v. City of New York

255 A.D.2d 102 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1998-11-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 102
Lois Gerard, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) Felix Contracting Corp., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v City Wide Asphalt Paving Co., Fourth-Party Defendant-Appellant.
[678 NYS2d 894]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.),

p. 103
entered on or about August 6, 1997, which denied fourth-party defendant City Wide Asphalt Paving Co.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence presented by fourth-party plaintiff Felix Contracting Corp. sufficed to raise a material factual issue as to the exact location of plaintiffs accident and thus precluded the grant of fourth-party defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth-party complaint (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 324). Upon appellant’s renewed application on oral argument, defendant and third-party plaintiffs brief is stricken. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Cases cited