Majority
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying in its entirety the cross motion of defendant McCarty Construction, Incorporated (McCarty) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. L. Charles Rose (plaintiff) slipped while standing on
The court properly denied that part of McCarty’s cross motion with respect to Labor Law § 241 (6). Contrary to McCarty’s contention, McCarty was an agent of the owner for purposes of providing a safe worksite (see, Russin v Picciano & Son, supra, at 317-318 ). Thus, we modify the order by granting in part the cross motion of McCarty and dismissing the Labor Law §§ 200 and 240 claims. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Hayes, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Cases cited
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co. 81 NY2d 494 at 501 p. 1123
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co. 78 NY2d 509 at 514 p. 1123
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & Son 54 NY2d 311 at 316-317 p. 1123
- Mamo v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. 209 AD2d 948 at 949 p. 1123