Majority
Determination of respondent Superintendent, dated October 21, 1997, finding that petitioner broker violated provisions of the Insurance Law and Regulations and imposing a $7,500 civil penalty, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Louise Gruner Gans, J.], entered on or about April 14, 1998) dismissed, without costs.
Accepting the credibility determinations of the Hearing Officer (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436 , 443), the record provides substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 , 179) that petitioner, a licensed excess line broker, violated Insurance Law §§ 2105 and 2118 and Insurance Department Regulation 41 (11 NYCRR 27.21) by filing excess line affidavits on behalf
Cases cited
- Berenhaus v. Ward 70 NY2d 436 at 443 p. 395
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights 45 NY2d 176 at 179 p. 395
- Howard v. Wyman 28 NY2d 434 at 438 p. 396
- Bernstein v. Toia 43 NY2d 437 at 448 p. 396