← Cases

Fatig v. DeRosa

261 A.D.2d 954 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1999-05-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 954
In the Matter of Sheryl Fatig, Respondent, v Vincent DeRosa, Appellant.
[690 NYS2d 356]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly granted petitioner’s application for an upward modification of child support based upon an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210 , 213; cf., Matter of Hulik v Hulik, 201 AD2d 909 ). Petitioner established that, after the parties entered into their stipulation that was incorporated but not merged into the judg-

Majority

p. 955
ment of divorce, she suffered an unanticipated disabling injury that prevented her from pursuing a nursing career. She is working only part time and her income is minimal, whereas respondent’s income has increased. Thus, petitioner met her burden (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, supra, at 213 ). The court properly applied the Child Support Standards Act guidelines in determining respondent’s child support obligations (see, Matter of Chappell v Chappell, 229 AD2d 952 ). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Szczur, J. — Support.) Present— Lawton, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Cases cited