Hyperlawhypertext legal database Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co. 265 A.D.2d 864

← Cases

Reichard-Willliams v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.

265 A.D.2d 864 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1999-10-01 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 864
In the Matter of Kathleen Reichard-Willliams, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John Williams, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Miller Electric Manufacturing Co. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. Weldcraft, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Fulton Thermal Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Fulton Thermal Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[695 NYS2d 813]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a bill of particulars in a timely manner, nor did they establish the existence of a meritorious claim (see, Koski v Ryder Truck, 244 AD2d 872 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — Vacate Judgment.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Cases cited