Majority
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence against him was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Thompson, JJ.,.concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 406