Majority
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that he was not aware of the risk of death in holding a loaded shotgun with his finger on the trigger in close proximity to the victim to warrant a charge of criminally-negligent homicide as a lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the second degree (see, People v Randolph, 81 NY2d 868 , 869; People v Green, 56 NY2d 427 , 434; People v Cameron, 244 AD2d 350 ; People v Ficaro, 233 AD2d 460 , 461; People v Stephens, 198 AD2d 245 , affd 84 NY2d 990 ; People v Williams, 192 AD2d 737 ; People v Jenkins, 176 AD2d 348 ).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Randolph 81 NY2d 868 at 869 p. 474
- People v. Green 56 NY2d 427 at 434 p. 474
- People v. Cameron 244 AD2d 350 p. 474
- People v. Stephens 84 NY2d 990 p. 474
- People v. Williams 192 AD2d 737 p. 474
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 474