Hyperlawhypertext legal database Leo v. F.L. Heughes & Co. 266 A.D.2d 809

← Cases

Leo v. F.L. Heughes & Co.

266 A.D.2d 809 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1999-11-12 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 809
Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents. Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[698 NYS2d 192]

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Leo v Artco Contr. ( 266 AD2d 808 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cases cited