Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). His contention that County Court erred in permitting a police officer to testify concerning defendant’s intent to sell drugs is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to raise that contention at trial (see, People v Espinal, 174 AD2d 500 , lv denied 79 NY2d 826 ). In any event, we conclude that any error is harmless (see, People v Goodwine, 177 AD2d 708 , lv denied 79 NY2d 920 ).
We reject the further contention of defendant that there was no probable cause for his arrest. Defendant was observed in a
Cases cited
- People v. Goodwine 177 AD2d 708 p. 888
- People v. Jones 90 NY2d 835 p. 889