Majority
—Judgment unanimously
Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contention that the proof is legally insufficient to establish that he knowingly obtained or possessed prison contraband (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 , 19; People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26 , 33). In any event, according the People the benefit of every reasonable inference (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428 , 437; People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111 , 1112), we conclude that the testimony of the inmate records coordinator is legally sufficient to establish that defendant received an inmate rule book containing a written prohibition and description of contraband (see generally, People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925 ; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495).
Lastly, we reject the contention that defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J. — Promoting Prison Contraband, 1st Degree.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurl-butt and Scudder, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Robinson 88 NY2d 1001 p. 928
- People v. Swift 241 AD2d 949 at 950 p. 928
- People v. Paris 229 AD2d 926 p. 928
- People v. Gray 86 NY2d 10 at 19 p. 928
- People v. Cona 49 NY2d 26 at 33 p. 928
- People v. Ford 66 NY2d 428 at 437 p. 928
- People v. Lewis 64 NY2d 1111 at 1112 p. 928
- People v. Williams 84 NY2d 925 p. 928
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 928
- People v. Benevento 91 NY2d 708 p. 928