Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hicks v. Citibank, N. A. 267 A.D.2d 185

← Cases

Hicks v. Citibank, N. A.

267 A.D.2d 185 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1999-12-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 185
Deborah Hicks, Respondent, v Citibank, N. A., Appellant.
[700 NYS2d 814]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about August 25, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly determined that the attorney’s affir

p. 186
mation and photographs submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment were sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant had constructive notice of the alleged defective condition (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 , 562). Moreover, most of defendant’s contentions in this regard are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Szigyarto v Szigyarto, 64 NY2d 275 , 280). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cases cited