← Cases

Roberts v. Pius

267 A.D.2d 292 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1999-12-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 292
Desmond Roberts et al., Appellants, v Donald A. Pius, Respondent.
[699 NYS2d 880]

—In an action to recover damages

p. 293
for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 11, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, notice of peeling paint is not notice of a hazardous lead condition (see, Andrade v Wong, 251 AD2d 609 ; Busto v Tamucci, 251 AD2d 441 ). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment (see, Brown v Marathon Realty, 170 AD2d 426 ).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cases cited