Majority
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.),
The trial court properly dismissed the causes of action sounding in breach of contract, since the parties never agreed on a residual fee payment, but at most had an unenforceable agreement to agree. Plaintiffs sent defendant numerous versions of a proposed residual fee agreement that were materially different and which were never signed and returned by defendant as plaintiffs requested defendant to do if it accepted (see, Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher, 52 NY2d 105 , 109-110). The cause of action in quantum meruit was also properly dismissed. Plaintiffs failed to prove that they rendered any actual post-closing services, as opposed to merely standing ready to perform such services, or the value of the services for which payment is sought (see, Farash v Sykes Datatronics, 59 NY2d 500 , 506). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Cases cited
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. Schumacher 52 NY2d 105 at 109-110 p. 295
- Farash v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc. 59 NY2d 500 at 506 p. 295