Majority
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 4, 1994, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
To establish a prima facie case under General Municipal Law § 205-e, a plaintiff, in addition to demonstrating a violation of a relevant statute, ordinance, or regulation, must also establish a practical or reasonable connection between the violation and the injury or death of the police officer (see, Cotter v Spear, 139 AD2d 555 , 557; see also, Mullen v Zoebe, Inc., 86 NY2d 135 , 140; Zanghi v Niagara Frontier Transp. Commn., 85 NY2d 423 , 441; Brunelle v City of New York, 269 AD2d 347 [decided herewith]; McGee v Adams Paper & Twine Co., 26 AD2d 186 , 195, affd 20 NY2d 921 ; Daggett v Keshner, 284 App Div 733 ). Here, even if the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations allegedly violated are part of a
Cases cited
- Cotter v. Spear 139 AD2d 555 at 557 p. 341
- Mullen v. Zoebe, Inc. 86 NY2d 135 at 140 p. 341
- Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Commission 85 NY2d 423 at 441 p. 341
- Brunelle v. City of New York 269 AD2d 347 p. 341
- McGee v. Adams Paper & Twine Co. 26 AD2d 186 at 195 p. 341
- McGee v. Adams Paper & Twine Co. 20 NY2d 921 p. 341
- Gonzalez v. Iocovello 93 NY2d 539 p. 342
- Desmond v. City of New York 88 NY2d 455 p. 342
- St. Jacques v. City of New York 88 NY2d 920 p. 342
- Kenavan v. City of New York 267 AD2d 353 p. 342