Majority
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The second misbehavior report, augmented by the testimony of one author and petitioner’s admissions, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated inmate rules 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]), 115.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [16] [i]), and 118.22 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [19] [iv]) (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130 , 139). Petitioner’s explanation of the events served to present a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964 , 966).
As conceded by respondent, there is insufficient evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated inmate rules 114.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [15] [i]), 107.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [iii]), and 180.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [i]) as charged in the first misbehavior report. We therefore modify the determination and grant the petition in part by annulling the determination that petitioner violated those inmate rules. Because one penalty was imposed and the record fails to specify any re
Cases cited
- People ex rel. Vega v. Smith 66 NY2d 130 at 139 p. 846
- Foster v. Coughlin 76 NY2d 964 at 966 p. 846
- Whitt v. Goord 259 AD2d 1045 at 1046 p. 847