People v. Pratt

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495). The contention of defendant that he was entitled to a justification charge is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Assuming, arguendo, that defense counsel erred in failing to establish the unavailability of the declarant of an alleged statement against penal interest, we conclude that defendant failed to show “ ‘that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s * * * error [ ], the result of the proceeding would have been different’ ” (People v Alicea, 229 AD2d 80 , 87, lv denied 90 NY2d 890 , quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 , 694). (Appeal from Judgment of