Majority
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s assertion, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in rendering its Sandoval ruling (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455 ; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282 ; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 ).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Walker 83 NY2d 455 p. 697
- People v. Pavao 59 NY2d 282 p. 697
- People v. Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 p. 697
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 697
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 697