Majority
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint since the complained-of condition which allegedly contributed to the infant plaintiffs injuries did not constitute a defect or an inherently dangerous condition (see, Jackson v Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 214 AD2d 650 ; Brown v Weinreb, 183 AD2d 562 ; Coletti v Chemical Bank, 258 AD2d 431 ; Reuscher v Pergament Home Ctrs., 247 AD2d 603 ; Reynolds v Reynolds, 245 AD2d 498 ). Assuming that a defect existed, it was not the proximate cause of the infant plaintiffs accident (see, Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308 ; Gleason v Reynolds Leasing Corp., 227 AD2d 375 ).
There is no merit to the contention that the injury was a result of inadequate supervision by the defendant’s employee (see, Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44 ; Foster v New Berlin Cent. School Dish, 246 AD2d 880 ; Walsh v City School Dist., 237 AD2d 811 ). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Jackson v. Supermarkets General Corp. 214 AD2d 650 p. 438
- Brown v. Weinreb 183 AD2d 562 p. 438
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. 51 NY2d 308 p. 438
- Gleason v. Reynolds Leasing Corp. 227 AD2d 375 p. 438
- Mirand v. City of New York 84 NY2d 44 p. 438
- Foster v. New Berlin Central School District 246 AD2d 880 p. 438
- Walsh v. City School District 237 AD2d 811 p. 438