Majority
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s arguments in support of his contention that the People failed to disprove his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ellis, 230 AD2d 751 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the justification defense and to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Ellis 230 AD2d 751 p. 632
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 632
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 632