People v. Robinson

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a bench trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and conclude that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 , 147).

The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence. In a bench trial, as in a jury trial, the credibility determinations made by the trier of fact are entitled to great deference (see, People v Van Akin, 197 AD2d 845 ). We cannot say, upon our review of the record, that County Court failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. We have examined defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment