Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bell v. New York City Employees' Retirement System 273 A.D.2d 119

← Cases

Bell v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

273 A.D.2d 119 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2000-06-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 119
In the Matter of Augusta Bell, Appellant, v New York City Employees’ Retirement System et al., Respondents.
[710 NYS2d 888]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered April 27, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ denial of his application for a disability pension, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

p. 120
The Medical Board’s finding that petitioner is not disabled was rationally based on its own examination of petitioner. The circumstance that the Medical Board chose to rely on such examination, rather than the conflicting reports of petitioner’s physicians, is not an indication of arbitrariness (see, Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756 , 761; Matter of Salem v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 237 AD2d 120 , lv denied 90 NY2d 802 ). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cases cited