Majority
In an action to recover damages
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly ruled that under the circumstances presented, the defendant did not, as a matter of law, have a duty to avoid mis-advising the plaintiff, his fellow Town Councilman, regarding whether the Town of Brookhaven would compensate the plaintiff for his legal expenses in defending against Federal criminal charges (see, Delcor Labs. v Cosmair, Inc., 169 AD2d 639 ; cf., Kimmell v Schaefer, 89 NY2d 257 ; AFA Protective Sys. v American Tel. & Tel. Co., 57 NY2d 912 ). The complaint is devoid of any indication that a special relationship existed between the parties such that the defendant undertook a duty to impart accurate information to the plaintiff (see, Prudential Ins. Co. v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, 80 NY2d 377 ; Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 NY2d 417 ; Rotanelli v Madden, 172 AD2d 815 ). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Delcor Laboratories, Inc. v. Cosmair, Inc. 169 AD2d 639 p. 600
- Kimmell v. Schaefer 89 NY2d 257 p. 600
- AFA Protective Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. 57 NY2d 912 p. 600
- Prudential Insurance v. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood 80 NY2d 377 p. 600
- Ossining Union Free School District v. Anderson 73 NY2d 417 p. 600
- Rotanelli v. Madden 172 AD2d 815 p. 600