Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In support of his motion pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 ), the defendant alleged sufficient facts to raise an inference that the prosecutor was engaging in race-based discrimination. In response, the prosecutor offered two race-neutral justifications for the exercise of her peremptory challenge of the prospective juror (see, People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101 ). Since the record supports the conclusion that the defendant “failed to prove that the reason[s] given by the prosecutor [were] pretextual” (People v Rose, 258 AD2d 483 , 484), the trial court properly sustained the peremptory challenge (see, People v Rodriguez, 259 AD2d 713 ).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Batson v. Kentucky 476 US 79 p. 802
- People v. Allen 86 NY2d 101 p. 802