Majority
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Bolton, 239 AD2d 511 ; People v Mateo, 144 AD2d 388 ). In any event, his contention is without merit (see, People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100 , cert denied 423 US 950 ; People v Davis, 190 AD2d 908 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Mackey, 77 NY2d 846 ; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 ; People v Brown, 242 AD2d 337 ). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Bolton 239 AD2d 511 p. 251
- People v. Broadie 37 NY2d 100 p. 251
- People v. Davis 190 AD2d 908 p. 251
- People v. Mackey 77 NY2d 846 p. 251
- People v. Lopez 71 NY2d 662 p. 251