Carameta v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.

28 A.D.2d 636 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1967-05-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 636

George Carameta, Respondent, v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Memorandum: We find the monetary award of the jury to be excessive in the light of the proof of plaintiff’s damages. (Appeal from order of. Erie Trial Term denying motion to set aside verdict in a negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.