Majority
p. 410Doris Thurber, Appellant, v Kenneth Thurber, Respondent. [721 NYS2d 288]
—In an action to recover damages for
p. 411
unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated November 12, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. The appellant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent’s retention of certain marital property constituted unjust enrichment (see, Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119 ).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Gould v Board of Educ., 81 NY2d 446 ; Marine Midland Bank-Southern v Thurlow, 53 NY2d 381 ; Stage Club Corp. v West Realty Co., 212 AD2d 458 ; Katz v American Tech. Indus., 96 AD2d 932 ). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Sharp v. Kosmalski 40 NY2d 119 p. 411
- Gould v. Board of Education 81 NY2d 446 p. 411
- Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. Thurlow 53 NY2d 381 p. 411
- Stage Club Corp. v. West Realty Co. 212 AD2d 458 p. 411
- Katz v. American Technical Industries, Inc. 96 AD2d 932 p. 411