Majority
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated November 23, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Bryan Bantry pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant Bryan Bantry.
To the extent that the motion is considered to have been made pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the defendant’s evidentiary submissions failed to show that a material fact alleged by the plaintiff to be true “[was] not a fact at all” and that “no significant dispute exist [ed] regarding it” (Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268 , 275; see, Adams v O’Connor, 245 AD2d 537 ; CD Music Co. v Bassline, Inc., 242 AD2d 654 ; Williams v New York City Hous. Auth., 238 AD2d 413 ; Jacobs v Haber, 232 AD2d 372 ). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Scadura v. Robillard 256 AD2d 567 p. 525
- Leon v. Martinez 84 NY2d 83 at 87-88 p. 525
- Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg 43 NY2d 268 at 275 p. 525
- Jacobs v. Haber 232 AD2d 372 p. 525