Majority
—In an action to
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The parties stipulated that the plaintiff was entitled to recover $50,000, representing damages incurred through April 22, 1987. However, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs application for leave to amend the complaint to include a claim for damages allegedly incurred after April 22, 1987. Leave to amend a pleading should be denied where, as here, the proposed amendment is devoid of merit (see, Fucci v Shellfish, Inc., 277 AD2d 280 ; Tarantini v Russo Realty Corp., 273 AD2d 458 ; Fandy Corp. v Lung-Fong Chen, 265 AD2d 450 ).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are not properly raised on this appeal. Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Crane, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Fucci v. Shellfish, Inc. 277 AD2d 280 p. 457