Majority
—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated March 28, 2000, which denied their separate motions for summary judgment and a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from erecting a fence.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to make a prima facie showing that they obtained title to a portion of the defendant’s property by adverse possession, as their alleged possession was not open
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from erecting a fence, as they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits (see, CPLR 6301).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz 304 NY 95 p. 581
- Village of Castleton-On-Hudson v. Keller 208 AD2d 1006 p. 581
- Tubolino v. Drake 178 AD2d 951 p. 581
- City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'n 86 AD2d 118 p. 581
- Merriam v. 352 West 42nd Street Corp. 14 AD2d 383 p. 581
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 p. 581
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 p. 581