Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [2]) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence, and the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 , 621), is legally sufficient to support the conviction (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 , 495). The proof establishes that defendant acted as an accomplice (see, Penal Law § 20.00) in the possession and use of a stolen credit card to purchase a television and VCR (see, People v Moye, 275 AD2d 887 , 888, lv denied 95 NY2d
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 876
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 876
- People v. Mathis 147 AD2d 851 at 854 p. 877
- People v. Goncalves 283 AD2d 1005 p. 877
- People v. Chipp 75 NY2d 327 at 336 p. 877