Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish a sale of the controlled substance (see, People v Crooks, 278 AD2d 931 , Iv denied 96 NY2d 782 ). Defendant’s further contention that the plea colloquy was insufficient to establish that the crime occurred in Livingston County relates to venue rather than “territorial jurisdiction” (People v McLaughlin, 80 NY2d 466 , 471; see, People v Greenberg, 89 NY2d 553 , 555-556), and thus
Cases cited
- People v. McLaughlin 80 NY2d 466 at 471 p. 901
- People v. Greenberg 89 NY2d 553 at 555-556 p. 901
- People v. Hansen 95 NY2d 227 at 230-231 p. 902
- People v. Moore 46 NY2d 1 at 7-8 p. 902