Majority
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judg
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
By order dated November 8, 1999, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs leave to file a late notice of medical malpractice (see, CPLR 3406 [a]), but also concluded that the plaintiffs had “significantly delay[ed] the litigation,” and directed them to pay “costs and attorney’s fees to defendants in the sum of $1,000.” The plaintiffs neither filed the notice nor paid the $1,000, and in its order dated July 21, 2000, the Supreme Court found that “plaintiff * * * contemptuously failed to pay the counsel fees.” Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (see, CPLR 3406 [a], [b]; Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 NY2d 1 ; Krulik v Meyerowitz, 160 AD2d 770 ). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Tewari v. Tsoutsouras 75 NY2d 1 p. 538
- Krulik v. Meyerowitz 160 AD2d 770 p. 538