Majority
—In a guardianship proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court properly determined that extraordinary circumstances existed (see, Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543 ; Matter of Bannister v Bannister, 81 AD2d 913 ). The court properly determined that the best interests of the child would be served by granting guardianship to the petitioner (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946 ; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167 ; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89 ; Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, supra, at 551-552 ; Matter of Banks v Banks, 285 AD2d 686 ). Krausman, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Bennett v. Jeffreys 40 NY2d 543 p. 718
- Bannister v. Bannister 81 AD2d 913 p. 718
- Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S. 64 NY2d 946 p. 718
- Eschbach v. Eschbach 56 NY2d 167 p. 718
- Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer 55 NY2d 89 p. 718
- Banks v. Banks 285 AD2d 686 p. 718