Majority
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the pretrial identification procedure was not suggestive (see, People v Sanford, 184 AD2d 671 ; People v Cox, 164 AD2d 779 ). However, the sentence imposed for murder in the second degree must run concurrently with the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, as the possession of the gun was not an act separate from the shooting (see, People v Joseph, 269 AD2d 407 ; People v Durio, 175 AD2d 842 ). Altman, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Cox 164 AD2d 779 p. 400
- People v. Joseph 269 AD2d 407 p. 400
- People v. Durio 175 AD2d 842 p. 400