Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable to the respondent Cho Pyung Choi.
The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Thus, it was incumbent on the plaintiff to come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 ). The plaintiff failed to do so (see, Monette v Keller, 281 AD2d 523 ; Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79 , 84). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Monette v. Keller 281 AD2d 523 p. 524
- Grossman v. Wright 268 AD2d 79 at 84 p. 524