Clark v. City of Rome

289 A.D.2d 965 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2001-12-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 965

Daryl N. Clark, Respondent, v City of Rome et al., Defendants, and Dominick Corigliano, Individually and as an Officer, Agent and Employee of City of Rome, Appellant.

[738 NYS2d 261]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Parker, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.