← Cases

In re Rose F.

293 A.D.2d 538 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2002-04-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 538
In the Matter of Rose F., Appellant. Ravi Amin, Respondent.
[739 NYS2d 834]

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.60 to authorize assisted outpatient treatment, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cutrona, J.), dated November 1, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The instant appeal has been rendered academic because the appellant has signed a voluntary agreement for services, and the challenged order and judgment has expired. The appeal does not fall within an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 , 714-715). Ritter, J.P., O’Brien, Krausman and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cases cited