Majority
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered January 9, 2002, which,
The motion was properly denied since defendant’s initial papers in support thereof do not identify a single witness who would be inconvenienced by having to travel to New York County. The requested change of venue is grounded upon a police accident report listing a witness who resides in Liberty, Sullivan County and the fact that plaintiff received medical treatment in Sullivan County; these factors alone are insufficient (see, Iassinski v Vassiliev, 220 AD2d 372 , 372-373). In any event, were we to consider the witness names and description of anticipated testimony first appearing in defendant’s reply papers (but see, Barbot v Nagabushana, 235 AD2d 289 ), we would also find such insufficient since, among other things, there is no indication that the witnesses were ever contacted (see, Carrozza v Galleria Mall, 292 AD2d 279 ). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.
Cases cited
- Iassinski v. Vassiliev 220 AD2d 372 at 372-373 p. 163
- Barbot v. Nagabushana 235 AD2d 289 p. 163
- Carrozza v. Galleria Mall 292 AD2d 279 p. 163