Majority
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J., at Mapp/,
Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal clearly encompassed the suppression ruling and related issues (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 , 833; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909 , 910-911). Accordingly, appellate review is foreclosed.
Although the appeal waiver, by its terms, permits defendant to challenge his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender, his claim that the People failed to comply with the procedural requirements for such an adjudication is a claim requiring preservation (People v Proctor, 79 NY2d 992 ; People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973 ), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant’s adjudication complied with the statutory requirements (see, People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140 ). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Wallach and Gonzalez, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Kemp 94 NY2d 831 at 833 p. 287
- People v. Moissett 76 NY2d 909 at 910-911 p. 287
- People v. Proctor 79 NY2d 992 p. 287
- People v. Oliver 63 NY2d 973 p. 287
- People v. Bouyea 64 NY2d 1140 p. 287