← Cases

Hadyk v. Babish

295 A.D.2d 885 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2002-06-14 Docket Appeal No. 1 English

Contents

Majority

p. 885
Donald M. Hadyk et al., Individually and Doing Business as In Vitro Bioanalytic Systems, Appellants, v John G. Babish et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[743 NYS2d 751]

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Stone, J.), entered March 23, 2001, which

p. 886
granted the motion of defendants John G. Babish and Paracelsian, Inc. for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 , 988; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566 , 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Cases cited