Majority
The Family Court’s determination that the appellant abused Alberto is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Gerald P., 275 AD2d 784 , 785; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E., III] v Douglas E., Jr., 191 AD2d 694 ).
In addition, there is sufficient evidence to support a finding of derivative abuse with regard to Marie (see Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Brittney C.], 242 AD2d 533 , 534; Matter of Eli G., 189 AD2d 764 , 765; Matter of Christina Maria C., 89 AD2d 855 ; cf. Matter of Christina P., 275 AD2d 783 , 784; Matter of Ijeoma O., 271 AD2d 691 , 692; Matter of Department of Social Servs. [Doris M.] v Juana M., 232 AD2d 487 ). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Dutchess County Department of Social Services ex rel. Douglas E. v. Douglas E. 191 AD2d 694 p. 321
- In re Dutchess County Department of Social Services 242 AD2d 533 at 534 p. 321
- In re Eli G. 189 AD2d 764 at 765 p. 321